background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

DEI Weighs High, But Shunted by Corporates?

Sonal Desai


Two recent developments caught the DEI world by storm.

1. Microsoft laid off its DEI team

2. John Deere rejected DEI policies

These are just two examples of large multinational firms that decided to put profits before people.

Sadly, the number of enterprises side-lining DEI teams, casually rejecting policies, and scrapping DEI teams is on the rise. The issue came to the limelight because two major organizations, each a giant in its industry segment, decided to lean on DEI.

Globally, similar reports by many organizations going slow on DEI are coming out.

Corporate reality:

Although consolidated data on the issue is yet to be established, the trend is contrary to DEI reports by leading market analysis and advisory companies.

Market analyst reports indicate that most corporates have a DEI strategy in place and that these organizations are faring better in the ESG Index.

For example, recent S&P 1500 data shows that firms with diverse leadership consistently earn higher environmental ratings from MSCI, an ESG data provider in the United States.

The scenario is not so different at home in India. Several conversations with leading CXOs and decision-makers in large corporates across industry verticals reveal that these enterprises lag in DEI.

This is not because they do not have the necessary strategy or policy in place, but because revenues, business, and investors take center stage. And the two events are not harmonious.

Cover-ups?

“It is more about corporate culture. We have started implementing DEI, but that is more towards women empowerment,” a leading CXO told me.

Another corporate consultant asked to survey a client’s employee satisfaction index for DEI was gently warned against asking probing questions. He framed the questions in such a manner that the responses were indexed on a scale of 1 to 10. Needlessly to say, there was no qualitative analysis or follow-ups. The company proudly presented its DEI report in the ESG and integrated components of the annual report.

The World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap score in 2023 stands at 68.4%, with India ranking 127 out of 146 countries in terms of gender parity.

These frank admissions coincide with the recent findings of the WriteCanvas-ASSOCHAM survey. The survey reveals that the social component of which DEI is a formidable part is most often subsumed with CSR, governance, and environment. Three aspects stand out:

· Corporates equate gender equality with DEI. Nonetheless, women’s representation at the board level was marginalized

· Corporates have all the necessary DEI policies covered under the Company’s Act and global mandates in place. The reality is that not many have adequate physical and digital infrastructure for persons with disabilities.

· Community development, equal access and opportunity, and child labor are gaining ground as part of CSR activities.

Are things turning around in India?

The Companies Act and SEBI mandate women’s representation on Indian boards, leading to remarkable growth in women’s participation on boards.

CareEdge advisory analyzed the top 1000 companies’ board composition from a diversity perspective, observing upticks in the top 150 listed companies and trends in big manufacturing organizations prioritizing inclusion of different genders and persons with disabilities, observes Swati Agrawal, President CareAnalytics.

However, there is no focused regulation or policy regarding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in India. The focus must be on addressing gender gaps and gender equality, while sustainability reporting focuses on gender gaps and gender equality. The industry must offer employment opportunities and address the banking requirements for employees and customers.

The change can be brought about just in the manner in which the shareholders are forcing corporates to consider environmental concerns to fight climate change. They must closely monitor how corporates implement DEI and ensure that the organizations are not just tick-boxing against all the parameters!

My take:

I believe that DEI adoption in its entirety will take a while. India is at the cusp of implementing DEI. Globally, enterprises are at least taking a small step towards diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Many organizations have promptly begun back-to-work policies for women. This is certainly a positive step. The shift is happening in the corporate sector, and that is a start.

Moreover, business leaders, stakeholders, and shareholders should understand that DEI is not just about improving diversity, but embracing the host of benefits that come along with it.

But there is also a nagging fear. Are Microsoft, John Deere and the ilk setting a precedent? Providing impetus to organizations to exploit loopholes and circumvent the regulations?


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

40% Public Companies Report Scope-3 Emissions: MSCI

WriteCanvas News


Forty percent of public companies are reporting scope-3 emissions.

According to a recent report by investment data and research provider MSCI, more and more public companies worldwide are disclosing about their greenhouse gas emissions footprints.

Almost 60% of them reported on Scope 1 and 2 emissions, which is an increase of 16 percentage points in the last two years. The number of companies reporting on at least some of their Scope 3 emissions has increased to 42% from 25% two years ago and roughly 35% last year. This indicates that the pace at which value chain emissions are being reported is growing even faster.

The MSCI report revealed that more businesses are establishing goals for reducing their emissions and that although the rate of goal-setting has slowed, the quality is rising, with a notable increase in decarbonization targets supported by science.

The report showed a stark discrepancy in disclosure between American and international corporations. For example, only 45% of American public companies reported on Scope 1 and 2 emissions, while 73% of companies in developed markets outside of the United States did the same. Similarly, only 29% of American public companies reported on Scope 3, whereas 54% of their counterparts in developed markets did the same.

Goal-setting:

According to the report, despite a slowdown in goal-setting, businesses are still setting climate targets. By the end of January 2024, 38% of companies had declared a net zero target and 52% of companies had disclosed an emissions reduction target, up 1% from the previous year. The quality of climate targets seems to be improving, even though the pace of target setting has slowed. As of 2020, only 1% of companies had set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C, compared to 20% last year.

MSCI noted that although listed companies’ greenhouse gas emissions seem to have leveled off, they have not decreased despite advancements in disclosure and target setting. The study predicts that in 2024, the direct operational greenhouse gas emissions of the world’s listed companies, or Scope 1, will remain constant at 11.8 billion tons, or almost one-fifth of all greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Listed companies are currently headed for a 3°C temperature increase this century, according to MSCI’s Implied Temperature Rise metric. Only 38% of companies are on a 2°C or lower pathway, with 11% aligned with 1.5°C.

According to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), to prevent the worst effects of climate change, global emissions would need to peak by 2025 and then decline by 7% a year until 2030.

The advancement in emissions reporting is being complemented by the expansion of regulatory mandates for climate-related disclosures across various jurisdictions. The EU has introduced new disclosure requirements, while nations are adopting sustainability reporting systems based on IFRS International Sustainability Standards Board’s Scope 1, 2, and 3 reporting standards. The SEC requires reporting on larger companies’ operational emissions but has halted implementation due to legal challenges.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

New Platform to reduce Sustainability Disclosures Gap between Private and Public Enterprises

WriteCanvas News


MSCI has launched a new platform that will allow private companies to self-report their sustainability and climate disclosures to investors.

The platform allows companies to securely report data to investors, approve or decline requests from GPs and lenders, and proactively provide data to active market participants.

Launched amid increased global demand for sustainability reporting, the platform offers investors insights into private company sustainability practices, similar to public company assessments.

The platform uses the ESG IDP template, a tool created by Apollo Global Management and Oak Hill Advisors, to standardize ESG disclosures for private markets. The tool also provides users with access to an AI-powered, carbon measurement and reporting tool provided by Climate Management & Accounting Platform (CMAP) provider Persefoni.

Eric Moen, ESG Head, MSCI, said, “As companies’ sustainability and climate considerations are increasingly being used in capital allocation, lending, and other decision-making processes, investors need an efficient and effective way to share and analyze this critical data.”

Kentaro Kawamori, CEO and Co-Founder, Persefoni, said, “This collaboration targets a pivotal area in today’s corporate sustainability efforts. It closes the carbon emissions reporting gap for both public and private companies. This initiative represents a material stride towards enhancing transparency in private assets, a sector where data accessibility has traditionally been challenging.”

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function twenty_twenty_one_the_posts_navigation() in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php:31 Stack trace: #0 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include() #1 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home2/writecxc...') #2 /home2/writecxc/public_html/index.php(17): require('/home2/writecxc...') #3 {main} thrown in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php on line 31