background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

IREDA CMD Advocates Innovative Financing to Bridge Green Hydrogen Cost Gap

WriteCanvas News


Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited (IREDA) Chairman and Managing Director Pradip Kumar Das discussed the need to make green hydrogen projects cost-competitive and bankable.

He was speaking in a panel discussion on “Financing Green Hydrogen: Bridging the Cost Gap” at the second International Conference on Green Hydrogen.

He emphasized the need to drive down project costs through innovative financing solutions, aligning green hydrogen with renewable technologies like solar, wind, and hydro.

IREDA endeavors:

IREDA is making significant strides in this direction.

  • IREDA Global Green Energy Finance IFSC Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of IREDA, has received provisional registration as a finance company at GIFT City from the International Financial Services Centre Authority (IFSCA).
  • It is financing its first green ammonia project and facilitating foreign-currency loans for export-oriented developers through its subsidiary at GIFT City, Gujarat.
  • With the aid of these loans, developers will be able to reduce their hedging expenses by 250–350 basis points, increasing the appeal of green hydrogen and its derivatives to international markets.
  • The company is also working on an in-house, standardized credit appraisal model to capture risks associated with green hydrogen projects more accurately.
  • The agency recently funded its first green ammonia project, indicating its entry into the green hydrogen space.
A standard internal credit model:

IREDA is developing a standardized internal credit appraisal model.

By factoring these risks into interest rates, the model aims to more precisely represent the risks related to green hydrogen projects. It is anticipated that these financial interventions will reduce project costs and improve the overall viability of green hydrogen initiatives.

Mr Das emphasized the significance of developing comprehensive strategies to address the difficulties in establishing a green hydrogen financing ecosystem.

To reduce risks and guarantee the sustainability of projects over the long run, this entails creating reliable testing facilities for producers of electrolysers, setting up central organizations to evaluate plant designs, and putting in place standardized offtake agreements, he said.

Panelists:

The panel also comprised distinguished industry leaders and experts, including Mr. V K Dewangan, CMD, REC; Mr. Ranjit Gupta, Chief Executive Officer, Ocior; Mr. Tarun Shankar, Senior Investment Professional, International Finance Corporation; Mr. Nishaanth Balashanmugam, Country Manager – India, Green Hydrogen Organisation; Mr. Moez Cherif, India Energy Lead, The World Bank; Mr. K Mukundan, Senior Principal – Strategic Initiatives and Policy Advisory, National Investment and Infrastructure Fund; and Mr. Hitesh Sachdeva, Partner, KPMG, who moderated the panel.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

50 Percent Large US Firms Depend on Spreadsheets to Manage ESG Data

WriteCanvas News


Fifty percent of large US firms dependent on spreadsheets to manage ESG data are ramping up their ESG data and reporting capabilities.

A professional services firm KPMG US survey reveals that most large companies feel confident that they are ahead of the curve in managing ESG data. 

KPMG US polled 550 board members, executives, and managers at public and private businesses for its most recent study. Of these, roughly two-thirds had revenues of $1 billion or more, primarily from North America and Europe and a variety of industry sectors.

The majority of large companies are ramping up their ESG data and reporting capabilities, the authors note. Many are planning to increase investments in sustainability-related software and workforce capabilities over the next few years.

However, nearly half report that they are still using spreadsheets to manage ESG data, the authors note.

The difference in perception and the real level of readiness:

The KPMG study showed a discrepancy between businesses’ perceived and real levels of readiness for ESG reporting. 

Though 83% of respondents claimed their companies were ahead of their peers in terms of sustainability reporting, many still seem to rely heavily on manual data collection. 

  • 47% used spreadsheets are the most commonly used ESG data management system
  • 47% use spreadsheets and ERP systems 
  • 38% use spreadsheets, ERP systems with ESG modules
  • 37% use specialized ESG software solutions 
  • 33% use ESG data management solutions 
Enhancing ESG data management:

Even though almost half of businesses still use spreadsheets to compile their ESG data, the majority have plans to improve their ESG reporting capabilities soon. 

  • 58% intend to use artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve their data consolidation and analysis over the next three years
  • 49% are currently offering management and employee training to improve the quality of their ESG reports

The survey indicates that businesses are prioritizing enhancing their ESG capabilities due to increasing regulatory pressure to disclose sustainability information.

  • 90% plan to increase their ESG investments over the next three years
  • 37% will invest in data collection and management tools as a top priority
  • 38% will invest in employee training and education 
  • 43% will invest in dedicated ESG personnel 
Capacity building

The survey said that many organizations see developing ESG capabilities as a crucial tool for improving organizational performance and meeting compliance requirements. 

The survey revealed that 45% of respondents believe enhancing ESG data management and reporting capabilities is the most effective method for integrating sustainability goals with business objectives.

ESG skills, including data analytics, sustainability management, risk assessment, and carbon emissions reporting, emerged as high skills. 83% of companies predicted increased ESG responsibilities in non-ESG roles.

Challenges:

The study highlighted the significant challenges businesses must overcome to integrate a sustainability strategy into their broader corporate goals. 

  • 44% of respondents cited “insufficient resources or capacity to collaborate effectively” as the biggest obstacle
  • 19% of respondents mentioned competing priorities or budgetary constraints
  • 21% said it was difficult to calculate the return on investment for ESG activities
  • Respondents mentioned internal silos and poor departmental communication as another major obstacle to sustainability integration 

Notably, more than 75% of respondents stated that they anticipate organizational restructuring to better align sustainability goals with overall business strategy to achieve better coordination, with 33% anticipating a “major restructuring.’

Quotes

Tegan Keele, Climate Data & Technology Leader, KPMG US, said, “Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies can help organizations gain valuable insights from disparate data and make more informed decisions. However, they are not a silver bullet for sustainability reporting or for setting a strategy that adds value to the business. Judgment calls like which data to use, which sources to collect the data from and the type of controls that need to be in place require a cohesive strategy. The strategy should be driven by the organization and informed by the technology rather than driven by it.”

Maura Hodge, ESG Audit Leader, KPMG US, said: “Timely and accurate reporting of sustainability information is key for businesses to meet regulatory reporting guidelines. However, compliance alone should not dictate an organization’s strategy – focusing on the core elements of ESG that will drive financial value over the long-term is paramount.”

Rob Fisher, ESG Leader, KPMG US, said, “Sustainability touches every part of the business, making it very difficult for large organizations to organize around and very easy to have a ‘check the box’ mentality and focus solely on compliance. The organizations that view new reporting requirements as more of an expansion of their broader sustainability strategy and who continue to invest in the right people and technology to make progress on that strategy will be better positioned to both realize and communicate the full value sustainability initiatives can bring to their business.”

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

ESG

Latest News Thumbnail

Decoding the ESG matrix: Understanding the factors that shape it

Renjini Liza Varghese


I was delighted with the evolution of ESG in the past decade. The subject has garnered global attention and got the attention of regulators who are constantly upgrading the frameworks and introducing new compliances. On the one hand, I am happy that ESG is dominating decision-making at the board level, but on the other, I am also saddened that the enterprises are moving towards more camouflage or greenwashing. It is a double-edged sword.

I have been thinking about this issue as a result of recent news and feature stories in the newspapers on television and other platforms. Globally, the political landscape, protests, the potential to manipulate the numbers, and the practice of “greenwashing” are a few issues dominating the sustainability landscape. The impact of ESG variables is particularly noticeable in funding choices, mergers & acquisitions, and investment strategies.

The moot point is, do these principles apply to India? Since the majority of the occurrences I have noticed are global in nature, it is still too early to draw any conclusions. But trust me, we are not too far behind.

ESG due diligence 

Take, for instance, the most recent KPMG report—a study on ESG Due Diligence. According to the research, more than half (53%) of investors have given up on M&A projects because of significant issues with regard to ESG due diligence. This study surveyed 200 US ESG practitioners, including corporate and financial investors and M&A debt providers.

However, this does not present the entire scenario. According to 42% of respondents, the results of the ESG due diligence led to lower purchasing prices. Over 60% investors stated that they would be willing to pay more if a company showed advanced ESG maturity and a commitment to their values. More than a third of them said that this premium might be higher than 5%.

It is interesting to note that KPMG, in earlier research for the EMEA region, observed a rise in ESG evaluation, with four out of five dealmakers stating that ESG concerns now occupy a significant position on their M&A agendas.

ESG gaining prominence 

Another study conducted by media analytics company Cision reveals the prominence of ESG issues in traditional media and social platforms. Globally, even as ESG reportage in the media and discussion on the topic on social media increased between January 2020 and June 2023, consumers were unwilling to pay more for environmentally friendly products and were uninterested in corporate social responsibility.

The study was focused on Germany. ESG concerns saw a 36 percent upswing in visibility in the first half of 2023 in comparison to the previous three years. Ecological issues increased by 74% during this evaluation period, social issues by 8%, and corporate governance issues by 6%. (No clarity).

While, on the one hand, corporates are embracing transparency to meet increased ESG reporting standards, we also come across instances of greenwashing, and this number, too, is rising. I believe the organizations have been unable to articulate and communicate their ESG strategies and related outcomes.

As a veteran in the communications industry, here are my two bits.

  • Effective communication is the key: Have a communications strategy in place. Identify the key points and the focus areas you want to communicate. Elaborate your ESG initiatives in the form of case studies.
  • Manuela Schreckenbach, Head of Insights Consulting, DACH at Cision, also notes that efforts are being made to combat “greenwashing.” A Dutch court recently granted environmental organizations’ request to move on with legal action against KLM over alleged greenwashing in the airline’s “Fly responsibly” commercials.

Companies of all stripes are increasingly promoting their “GREEN” efforts. Some businesses have resorted to overstating, lying about, or inventing their ESG credentials rather than making genuine adjustments to their operations and goods. How many of these claims will withstand scrutiny from authorities, activist groups, or opportunistic customers remains to be seen.

As per a Reuters report, as part of a concerted effort by international regulators, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has recently enforced action against corporate greenwashing. Airlines, banks, fashion retailers and energy giants are among over 20 companies targeted by the ASA for misleading statements and representations about their sustainability and environmental credentials.

Recalling here the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority investigation into retailers ASOS, Boohoo, and Asda’s fashion brand, George.

I leave you with a food for thought —— Sustainable practices should be a habit and not to be forced element. Do you agree?


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function twenty_twenty_one_the_posts_navigation() in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php:31 Stack trace: #0 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include() #1 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home2/writecxc...') #2 /home2/writecxc/public_html/index.php(17): require('/home2/writecxc...') #3 {main} thrown in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php on line 31