background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

ISO Developing Net Zero Standard

WriteCanvas News


ISO is developing its first net zero international standard.

The aim is to provide clarity, robust requirements, and enable comprehensive climate action for a sustainable world.

Expected to launch at COP30 in November 2025, the new standard is being designed to provide a global solution to guide organizations as they embark on their net zero transition.

It is an evolution of the ISO Net Zero Guidelines, which aimed to provide credible best practice and protect against greenwashing.

Meanwhile, thousands of experts across more than 170 countries are expected to collaborate through national standards bodies. A public consultation is expected to open later in 2025 to support global input.

“ISO takes our role in supporting a net zero transition seriously. As part of our Climate Commitment, we look forward to delivering an international standard the market has been asking for, and importantly, suitable for organizations of all sizes, sectors and geographies,” said Noelia Garcia Nebra, Head, Sustainability, ISO.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

AI Washing Eroding Trust in ESG Initiatives?

Renjini Liza Varghese


The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) space has long grappled with greenwashing. In greenwashing, companies often under or over-quote their environmental commitment for marketing advantage. We are also familiar with phrases like Blue washing and Pinkwashing, categorized under the ‘S’ factor’S’ ESG.

AI washing is emerging as a significant challenge in ESG dynamics.

One may wonder about the connection between AI washing and sustainability. Therefore, we begin with a definition of AI washing.

AI washing is the practice of a business overstating the amount of AI that is used in its goods and services. A recent order regarding AI washing from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) piqued my interest in this topic. Their position is unambiguous: businesses need to disclose their real AI integration. This is vital because exaggerated claims regarding AI’s capabilities have the potential to deceive stakeholders and investors.

I tried to connect the dots between AI and sustainability, and here is my take on the issue. 

We have seen tech platforms enabling, fast-tracking, and measuring the impacts of sustainability initiatives. Sustainability and technology go hand-in-hand. Technology and sustainability cannot be delinked from each other. All the same, if not controlled or measured, technology can also play a spoiler to the company’s company’s-2, -3, and now -4 measurements.

Take, for example, a company that touts its “AI-powered “sustainability initiative. This may, in reality, be fundamental data analysis. The misleading narrative is a classic case of AI-driven greenwashing. It can undermine transparency and erode trust in ESG, creating further hurdles in recognizing genuine sustainability efforts. This presents a huge concern.

Deception in the digital age:

The impact of a narrative is deep and wide. When companies embellish their AI prowess, stakeholders become sceptical. This hinders genuine AI advancements that could benefit both businesses and society.

Excited, AI washing can slacken tech adoption and hinder progress.

Let me give you an example. AI tools can optimize resource utilization, identify environmental risks, and enhance supply chain transparency. On the other hand, AI washing undermines the confidence of investors and stakeholders who fall prey to pretence or false reports and invest in companies that don’t deliver on their promises. This can have a significant impact on market dynamics.

AI washing is a sophisticated evolution of greenwashing. Companies can leverage AI-generated reports or fabricated data analysis to bolster their supposed sustainability efforts, making it increasingly difficult to differentiate genuine progress from marketing gimmicks.

How to safeguard against AI washing?

It is a call for extra vigilance. To combat AI washing and ensure the integrity of ESG initiatives, several key steps are essential:

Critical thinking: Do not take claims about AI at face value. Ask questions about the specific applications and their impact.

Prioritize transparency: Clearly articulate how AI is integrated into your ESG strategy. Businesses must provide detailed explanations of their AI-powered sustainability programs. What specific challenges are these programs designed to address? How is AI being utilized to achieve these objectives?

Independent verification: Support independent audits and certifications to substantiate the AI adoption and impacts in sustainability efforts. Also, encourage research and reporting that investigates and exposes AI washing practices.

Regulatory support:  Supporting regulatory bodies in establishing clear guidelines and enforcing them effectively is crucial in combating AI washing.

Investor and consumer education:  Empowering both investors and consumers through educational initiatives is crucial. Foster open dialogues and raise awareness about AI washing.

AI washing poses a significant threat to the integrity of ESG initiatives. However, through collaborative action and a collective commitment to transparency, we can ensure that AI is used as a force for good, driving genuine progress in sustainability.

After all, in today’s current landscape, trust is the bedrock of a solid corporate reputation and a key differentiator in attracting stakeholders who value genuine ESG commitment.

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

Green Claims under Scrutiny: New Guidelines in the Offing

Renjini Liza Varghese


Green claims, henceforth will be dealt with an iron hand in India!

A recent headline, “Govt Seeks to Check Ads with False Environment Claims,” resonated with me deeply. It echoes my previous blog on tightening global regulations against greenwashing. Attention greenwashers: India is tightening its grip on misleading environmental claims.

The government announcement is an exciting initiative. We will have guidelines on green claims made by companies. Besides, it will empower consumers to discern genuine eco-friendly practices from mere marketing jargon.

Transparency is key:

These guidelines aim to bring much-needed transparency to claims like “eco-friendly,” “environmentally conscious,” and “cruelty-free.” Manufacturers will be required to specify the basis of their claims under defined categories, such as product materials, packaging, manufacturing processes, transportation, usage, disposal, or services offered.

Importantly, these claims must be backed by evidence and, where applicable, verified by third-party certifications.

India’s green claims landscape lacked a unified approach, with calls for action scattered across various segments. Recognizing the need for better consumer protection in greenwashing, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs has established a committee. This committee comprises industry bodies like FICCI, CII, ASCI (Advertising Standard Council of India, MAIT (Manufacturing Association Information Technology), and IBHA (Indian Beauty and Hygiene Association). Its role is to look into the growing concerns regarding greenwashing.

What truly excites me is the synchronicity of India’s greenwashing crackdown with the rollout of its Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) regulations. This two-pronged approach demonstrates a commitment to responsible business practices and sustainable development, placing India at the forefront of global environmental efforts.

The new guidelines will mark a significant step towards empowering Indian consumers and building trust in the marketplace. By ensuring transparency and accountability in environmental claims, India can foster a more sustainable future.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

Greenwashing: A Sneaky Shade of Green

Renjini Liza Varghese


Are you a starry-eyed consumer mesmerized by “organic,” “eco-friendly,” and “100% green” labels?  Has India advanced to such a level that the producers have adopted green ways of production in such a short time? Are they reliable? Can I believe the printed claims completely? Pause before grabbing that “natural” labeled product and ask yourself: is it true green or just clever greenwashing?

While India’s ESG (environment, social, and governance) journey is in its early stages, with regulations just starting to roll out, global developments like the EU’s Green Claims Directive are setting new standards. This is significant considering India has a sizeable export community that caters to the European market. India is one of the key exporters to almost all major economies in the world. 

Europe has been leading the way when it comes to the implementation of climate / environmental regulations. The latest from their stable is the green claims directive. In other words, it is a clear step towards truly clubbing the greenwashing.   

The latest in this regard is MEPs (members of the European Parliament) voting in favor of the Green Claims Directive on 17th 17, 2024. As per the new norm:

i) Carbon Offsetting is Out: companies will not be able to do carbon offsetting and claim green which includes- the use of terms such as “environmentally friendly”, “natural”, “biodegradable”, “climate neutral” or “eco”.

ii) Vague Claims Get the Boot – Claims must be backed by verified certifications.

The new law was formulated based on the concerns of the practices followed by companies widely using carbon offsetting schemes to justify labeling products “carbon neutral”, or imply that consumers can fly, buy new clothes, or eat certain foods without making the climate crisis worse.

The proposed green directive adopted by the European Commission in March 2023 became law in January 2024. This will be rolled out in 2026, giving buffer time to follow suit. As a first step in 2022, the European Commission adopted the proposal for a Directive on Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition. 

According to the European Commission, “53% of green claims give vague, misleading, or unfounded information; 40% of claims have no supporting evidence; and half of all green labels offer weak or non-existent verification. There are 230 sustainability labels and 100 green energy labels in the EU, with vastly different levels of transparency.”

What does it mean to Indian exporters, in one word, calls for a course correction? Europe’s stringent standards create a clear roadmap for responsible production and sustainable practices. By aligning with these global norms, Indian companies can gain a competitive edge and build trust with eco-conscious consumers worldwide.

The stringent global norms also create a structure, thus setting the stage for other countries like India for a smoother transition. The transition can be strengthened with clear, enforceable regulations and robust third-party certification. 

It is prudent to say that it is time for Indian businesses to shift from empty green claims to real action. Let’s embrace transparent sustainability practices, not just for exports but for the future of our environment. 


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

Why Should Companies Prepare a Sustainability Report?

Renjini Liza Varghese


Globally, the pace of climate action is accelerating. More countries are enacting and embracing green mandates and tightening regulations. This pushes companies to reassess their operations and ensure their products meet evolving sustainability standards.

In this context, the value of a sustainability report gains traction. These reports serve as vital tools for companies to navigate the green landscape.

The conversations about the suitability report with industry stakeholders reveal new facts, that are sometimes eye-openers.

For instance, in the past few months, I have come across many interesting facts regarding the sustainability initiatives of large and mid-size organizations. Basis the companies’ sustainability initiatives and my observations, I am bracketing those into three key categories.

The three key categories:

Laid-back approach: These companies implemented sustainable practices early on but haven’t documented the impact, or claimed carbon credits, leaving potential value untapped.

The greenwashing dodger: Companies seeking easy shortcuts and using “greenwashing practices” as tightened regulations are sometimes a challenge.

Uninformed exporters: Many Indian MSMEs and SMBs, particularly exporters, are unaware of the changing global regulatory landscape, putting them at risk of being left behind.

Several survey reports have highlighted the above-mentioned reasons why Indian companies have missed out on crucial deals. Except for the top 1000 listed companies (by market capitalization), creating a sustainability or ESG report is not mandatory in the country. All the same, with increasing awareness, the time is right for companies to develop a sustainability report.

Let me list the 5 compelling benefits of creating a sustainability report.

1. Identify gaps and opportunities: A report acts as a mirror, reflecting your environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and helps set goals for future progress.

2. Future-proofing: Even if your company isn’t currently subject to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting regulations, an annual sustainability report makes future ESG reporting easier.

3. Carbon credits: By quantifying your environmental impact, you unlock the potential to claim valuable carbon credits, leading to financial benefits and compliance with some environmental regulations.

4. Transparency and trust: Openly communicating your sustainability effort fosters trust and strengthens relationships with stakeholders, including investors, customers, and employees.

5. Brand image and reputation: In today’s conscious consumer market, a strong sustainability report can significantly boost your brand image and attract environmentally conscious customers.

So, creating a sustainability report is no longer optional. It’s a strategic investment that unlocks numerous benefits, regardless of your company’s size or current regulatory obligations. This can secure a competitive edge for the companies and also unlock a multitude of benefits.

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Green bonds, Sustainable finance

Latest News Thumbnail

EU Approves Green Bond Standards to Combat Greenwashing

WriteCanvas News


The European Union (EU) lawmakers have approved green bond standards for companies issuing green bonds to combat greenwashing. The initiative will promote transparency in the market, and prevent misleading claims.

“MEPs have adopted a new voluntary standard for the use of a European Green Bond (EuGB) label, the first of its kind in the world,” the EU confirmed in a press release.

The green bond market experienced a 75% increase in 2021, reaching the USD half trillion mark for the first time, with Europe leading the way with 51% of global issuance.

Benefits:

The green bond standards enable investors to confidently invest in environmentally friendly businesses and technologies. It boosts a company’s confidence in its bond’s suitability for investors seeking green bonds. The move also aids the EU’s transition to climate neutrality.

The standards align with the EU’s taxonomy framework, which outlines which economic activities are considered environmentally sustainable. They outline transparency, external reviews, and flexibility as the key moot points to boost investor confidence.

Transparency:

Businesses using the EuGB label are required to disclose their green bond proceeds usage and align them with their sustainability transition plans.

Companies unable to meet strict EuGB standards but still aiming for greener bonds can utilize template formats for disclosure requirements.

External reviewers:

To ensure standards are upheld, the regulation creates a registration process and regulatory framework for external examiners.

The document requires that any potential conflicts of interest encountered by external reviewers be acknowledged, handled, or managed.

Flexibility:

EuGB holders must ensure 85% of the bond’s raised funds are used for taxonomy-compliant economic activities until the taxonomy framework is fully operational.

The issuer can allocate the remaining 15% of the investment to other economic activities as long as they clearly explain its allocation, the EU said.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

background

ESG

Latest News Thumbnail

Decoding the ESG matrix: Understanding the factors that shape it

Renjini Liza Varghese


I was delighted with the evolution of ESG in the past decade. The subject has garnered global attention and got the attention of regulators who are constantly upgrading the frameworks and introducing new compliances. On the one hand, I am happy that ESG is dominating decision-making at the board level, but on the other, I am also saddened that the enterprises are moving towards more camouflage or greenwashing. It is a double-edged sword.

I have been thinking about this issue as a result of recent news and feature stories in the newspapers on television and other platforms. Globally, the political landscape, protests, the potential to manipulate the numbers, and the practice of “greenwashing” are a few issues dominating the sustainability landscape. The impact of ESG variables is particularly noticeable in funding choices, mergers & acquisitions, and investment strategies.

The moot point is, do these principles apply to India? Since the majority of the occurrences I have noticed are global in nature, it is still too early to draw any conclusions. But trust me, we are not too far behind.

ESG due diligence 

Take, for instance, the most recent KPMG report—a study on ESG Due Diligence. According to the research, more than half (53%) of investors have given up on M&A projects because of significant issues with regard to ESG due diligence. This study surveyed 200 US ESG practitioners, including corporate and financial investors and M&A debt providers.

However, this does not present the entire scenario. According to 42% of respondents, the results of the ESG due diligence led to lower purchasing prices. Over 60% investors stated that they would be willing to pay more if a company showed advanced ESG maturity and a commitment to their values. More than a third of them said that this premium might be higher than 5%.

It is interesting to note that KPMG, in earlier research for the EMEA region, observed a rise in ESG evaluation, with four out of five dealmakers stating that ESG concerns now occupy a significant position on their M&A agendas.

ESG gaining prominence 

Another study conducted by media analytics company Cision reveals the prominence of ESG issues in traditional media and social platforms. Globally, even as ESG reportage in the media and discussion on the topic on social media increased between January 2020 and June 2023, consumers were unwilling to pay more for environmentally friendly products and were uninterested in corporate social responsibility.

The study was focused on Germany. ESG concerns saw a 36 percent upswing in visibility in the first half of 2023 in comparison to the previous three years. Ecological issues increased by 74% during this evaluation period, social issues by 8%, and corporate governance issues by 6%. (No clarity).

While, on the one hand, corporates are embracing transparency to meet increased ESG reporting standards, we also come across instances of greenwashing, and this number, too, is rising. I believe the organizations have been unable to articulate and communicate their ESG strategies and related outcomes.

As a veteran in the communications industry, here are my two bits.

  • Effective communication is the key: Have a communications strategy in place. Identify the key points and the focus areas you want to communicate. Elaborate your ESG initiatives in the form of case studies.
  • Manuela Schreckenbach, Head of Insights Consulting, DACH at Cision, also notes that efforts are being made to combat “greenwashing.” A Dutch court recently granted environmental organizations’ request to move on with legal action against KLM over alleged greenwashing in the airline’s “Fly responsibly” commercials.

Companies of all stripes are increasingly promoting their “GREEN” efforts. Some businesses have resorted to overstating, lying about, or inventing their ESG credentials rather than making genuine adjustments to their operations and goods. How many of these claims will withstand scrutiny from authorities, activist groups, or opportunistic customers remains to be seen.

As per a Reuters report, as part of a concerted effort by international regulators, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has recently enforced action against corporate greenwashing. Airlines, banks, fashion retailers and energy giants are among over 20 companies targeted by the ASA for misleading statements and representations about their sustainability and environmental credentials.

Recalling here the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority investigation into retailers ASOS, Boohoo, and Asda’s fashion brand, George.

I leave you with a food for thought —— Sustainable practices should be a habit and not to be forced element. Do you agree?


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Green finance, sustainability, ESG

Latest News Thumbnail

Sebi expands ESG to six new mutual funds schemes

Sonal Desai


The mutual fund industry in India is all set to embrace more green initiatives.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the market regulator, has issued a circular introducing a new category of mutual fund schemes for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing. These schemes fall under a distinct subcategory within the thematic category of equity schemes.

Sebi has taken definitive steps to promote green finance. Additionally, Sebi hopes to reduce the risks of mis-selling and greenwashing in MFs as part of the initiative.

“… it is decided to introduce a separate sub-category for ESG investments under the thematic category of Equity schemes. Any scheme under the ESG category shall be launched with one of the following strategies – a. Exclusion, b. Integration, c. Best-in-class & Positive Screening, d. Impact investing, e. Sustainable objectives, f. Transition or transition related investments,” the regulator said.

The strategies:
Exclusion strategies involve excluding securities based on ESG-related operations, corporate strategies, or industry verticals. Integration involves considering both traditional financial and ESG factors in investment decisions. Best-in-class and positive screening involves investing in businesses outperforming peers on ESG-related performance metrics. Fund managers should assess environmental, social, and governance issues, manage them, and invest in sectors with long-term ESG trends for sustainable objectives. Supporting environmental transition companies generates positive social and environmental impacts.

What is mandatory?
Sebi mandates 80% of ESG schemes’ assets under management to invest in equity and equity-related instruments, and 65% in companies with BRSR disclosures. Investment criteria apply from October 1, 2024, with a one-year grace period for non-compliant schemes.

The circular emphasizes enhanced disclosure requirements, including scheme strategy, ESG scores, voting, and annual fund manager commentary. It also calls for independent assurance and certification by AMCs to ensure regulatory compliance and independent assurance on ESG scheme portfolios.

The disclosures:
Sebi also outlined some disclosure requirements for the ESG schemes. Mutual funds must clearly disclose the following:
1. Name of ESG strategy in the name of the concerned ESG fund/scheme
ii. Security wise BRSR Core scores along with the BRSR scores in their monthly portfolio statements of ESG schemes
iii. The name of the ERPs providing ESG scores for the ESG schemes, along with the ESG scores.

The market:
Rating agency Crisil predicts India’s mutual fund industry assets could reach Rs 50 lakh crore by 2025, up from Rs 30 lakh crore in November 2020. It believes independent research and analytics will be crucial. A CRISIL Research analysis revealed that a significant portion of funds are in companies with good ESG scores, with exposure to ‘Leadership’, ‘Strong’, and ‘Adequate’ categories at Rs 2.29 lakh crore, Rs 5.22 lakh crore, and Rs 6.46 lakh crore, respectively.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

SEBI Approves Concept For Blue And Yellow Bonds

Sonal Desai


In a bid to strengthen the framework for green bonds and address rising issues concerning green washing, market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has decided to introduce two new concepts for sustainable finance.

The new bonds—blue and yellow, are sub-categories of green debt securities. The concept of blue bonds is related to water management and the marine sector while yellow bonds pertain to solar energy, SEBI said in a press release.

According to media reports, the measures have been taken in the backdrop of increasing interest in sustainable finance in India and globally. They add impetus to align the existing framework for green debt securities with the updated Green Bond Principles (GBP) recognized by IOSCO.

It must be noted that Indian companies raised approximately $7 billion through ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) and Green bonds in 2021 viz as viz $1.4 billion in 2020 and $4 billion in 2019.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function twenty_twenty_one_the_posts_navigation() in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php:31 Stack trace: #0 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include() #1 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home2/writecxc...') #2 /home2/writecxc/public_html/index.php(17): require('/home2/writecxc...') #3 {main} thrown in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php on line 31