background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Mahindra Logistics’ Digital Tool to Decarbonize Supply Chain

WriteCanvas News


Mahindra Logistics has launched the ‘Emission Analytics Report’, a digital tool that offers real-time carbon emissions visualization to aid in decarbonizing supply chains.

Offered on a monthly subscription model, the platform provides detailed insights into emissions intensity, and fuel usage.

The reporting tool quantifies shipment-level reporting of Scope 3 emissions for various industries, including auto, manufacturing, consumer goods, retail, FMCG, mobility, pharmaceuticals, e-commerce, quick commerce, and freight forwarding. It also offers emissions savings certificates for transportation.

The report is created using a SaaS platform accredited by GLEC and ISO 14083. It is accessible on the Web and mobile devices, ensuring seamless integration into existing systems.

The platform also facilitates customers adhering to BRSR regulations and companies aiming to enhance sustainability and transition towards green logistics.

Swayantani Ghosh, Chief Sustainability & CSR Officer, Mahindra Logistics, said, “In a rapidly growing economy like India, the need to lead a comprehensive effort in the fight against climate change is the need of the hour. Particularly in the context of the supply chain, scope 3 decarbonization imposes unique challenges in the absence of the right framework, tool and data.”

She said that as an integrated logistic player, Mahindra Logistics has introduced a shipment-level Emission Analytics Report using AI, enabling clients to track carbon footprints, access emission savings analytics, and evaluate decarb modeling.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Presenting a right sustainability narrative imperative to achieve SDGs: IMC banking conference

WriteCanvas News


The UN’s 17 SDGs address critical issues like access to clean water and sanitation, sustainable energy, and building sustainable cities. Importantly, the SDGs are interconnected. Progress on one goal can support the progress of the other. For example, ensuring access to clean energy (SDG 7) can contribute to reducing poverty (SDG 1) and improving health outcomes (SDG 3). This interconnectedness highlights the need for a balanced approach to social, economic, and environmental sustainability. This was the crux of IMC’s 14th Annual Banking & Finance Conference.

Experts discussed the pivotal role that the banking, non-banking, and financial industries is playing in the government of India’s ambitious financial inclusion drive during a day-long event.

Inaugurating the conference, Himanish Chaudhuri, Partner and Financial Services Industry Leader, Deloitte India, said that India is the poster child of financial inclusion. “We have conquered the complexities of the problem by using technology. We are data-rich. We want to go from being information-rich to being data-rich to reach the insight-rich stage. This will help us to drive last-mile financial inclusion.”

One such panel discussion was on: How Financial Institutions can play a Pivotal Role in Achievement of Sustainable Development Goal

The panel included Manish Kumar, Head of ESG & CSR, ICICI Bank Ltd, Renjini Liza Varghese, CEO, WriteCanvas,  Smitha Hari. President (India), auctus ESG, Heena Khushalani, Partner, Climate Change and Sustainability Services, EY India, Jitesh Shetty, Co-Founder/CEO, Credible ESG. The panel was moderated by  Swati Agrawal, CEO & President – Advisory, CARE Analytics and Advisory Pvt. Ltd.

Some edited excerpts:

Manish Kumar 

​All conventional sources that specify and use green are termed green bonds. Some new instruments, like securitization, have been introduced in the market. In this case, a pool of receivables with sustainability or green as an end-use can be securitized as a source for raising liabilities.

Heena Khushalani

We have witnessed tremendous momentum being created at the awareness level​ of green lending among banks during the past year. Has it progressed? Not really. They’re trying to figure out how to do it while maintaining the economics, which is why it’s not progressing because of everyone’s current predicament or dilemma.

Smitha Hari 

Projects related to the Sustainable Development Goals are seen as having a high risk and low return when looking at the capital stack. ​ For these, the grants or philanthropies come with the lowest rate, followed by government subsidies, equity, and debt. Dfis and MDB Capital can influence the market ​with diverse instruments​ in the form of credit enhancements. ​Instead of directly lending, if they come in with a credit enhancement, that can multiply the market

Renjini Liza Varghese

The absence of a clear narrative, inconsistent delivery, and missing data points present the three main obstacles to effectively communicating with the stakeholders. Filling in the blanks with data is crucial to constructing a consistent story.

Jitesh Shetty

Customers want data to flow in a seamless automated way. But the challenge is from within the bank or the enterprise. They don’t have the right owners of the data. The data not in the right place. But that is changing now with BRSR.

Other panels also touched upon ESG and rising climate risk :

Dr. Srikanta K. Panigrahi, Director General and Distinguished Research Fellow, Indian Institute of Sustainable Development (IISD), New Delhi

These days, risk finance is becoming increasingly popular. Thanks to the RBI’s climate-related financial risk disclosure on the public platform, leading banks like the State Bank of India have developed risk assessment procedures and are hiring climate risk officers in prime branches. The banking sector is empowering the green offshoot.

Rajiv Anand, Deputy Managing Director, Axis Bank Limited

Axis Bank has a board-level ESG committee, with its chair also serving on the credit committee. When it comes to green financing, we view the world through two lenses: our credit lens, which acts as a ban, and our ESG lens.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Is Social the Blindspot in ESG?

WriteCanvas News


We’re excited to announce the release of a concise version of our first research report on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)! The report was unveiled at a recent Assocham webinar in honor of World Environment Day 2024.

With India’s rollout of the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework, we recognized a potential gap in how companies address the “S” (social) aspect of ESG. Our research suggests that many organizations are neglecting this critical area or limiting their social efforts to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives.

This led us to delve into the question: Is the Social Factor the Blind Spot in ESG? Our report explores this topic and offers valuable insights.

Interested in learning more?

Download the concise report by clicking below.

https://writecanvas.in/our-templates/

To access the full report, contact us at [email protected].

We believe this research will be a valuable resource for businesses looking to strengthen their ESG practices.

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

Are corporates using the BRSR loopholes rope to climb up?

Sonal Desai


Are corporates using the BRSR loopholes as a means of ascent?

Recent surveys and reports have brought to light not just the lapses in the questionnaire format developed by the market regulator, but also how the corporate sector has leveraged the BRSR loopholes for its benefit.

WriteCanvas has highlighted how certain companies have utilized experts to help them navigate the different regulatory requirements and mandates mostly by tick-boxing.

The reasons these companies have been able to get away with greenwashing are that there are no metrics to measure a corporate’s sustainability/ESG claims and the callous attitude of the watchdogs to conveniently look the other way.

This gives the corporate not just the wings to skirt the most pressing issues, but also ignore the red flags if any are raised. For example, in a recent circular, the National Stock Exchange has provided specific examples of how large corporates are providing insufficient details, or misrepresenting the facts by placing them under different subject heads.

Another survey by the CSE which studied 28 random reports of 14 listed companies remarked that the companies did not provide the details in most instances.

The BRSR framework in India is the first to mandate the sharing of detailed environmental performance and compliance data in the public domain.

External experts and internal auditors are supposed to keep a vigil over the information and content right from the concept till the stage when the last signatory signs it.

Identifying the problem:

Sadly, a majority of them cannot pull the plug when needed. I am certain that almost all of them can identify the BRSR loopholes and also have the solutions or refer to solutions experts.

CSE Program Director, Industrial Pollution, Nivit Yadav, believes transparency should drive investor decision-making. However, there’s room for improvement, and SEBI reviews guidance notes and BRSR format regularly.

But in a hazy world where the head honchos are busy signing M&A agreements and expanding operations with an eye on the stock market, the BRSR report is just one fly in their tea cup, possibly an irritant that needs to be tick-boxed and filed away.

The fact that some of these regulations mandate a board member to be a part of the sustainability/ESG committee can make a difference, is fast gathering dust.

The CSO, CRO significance:

I am by no means saying that the BRSR reports are fudged or the information is false. I am reiterating the points that the watchdog as well as the critics have argued–the corporates are answering all the questions, filling all the boxes, supplementing all the links, and providing internal and external audit reports. And yet, there is not a single organization globally that can claim to have met one regulatory obligation without leveraging a loophole.

As per a Havard Business Review article, the rise in corporate appointing of a chief sustainability officer (CSO) is largely due to the increasing popularity of the term, but there is still a lack of clarity about CSO’s tasks and responsibilities, leading to fragmented ownership, internal competition, and inefficiency. This confusion is partly due to the lack of history and benchmarks for the CSO role.

Secondly, traditional risk management methods are insufficient for complex risks, Companies also require a holistic approach with a Chief Risk Officer to oversee risk profile and board liaison.

The time is ripe to face the truth. The truth is that the corporate has not been able to fulfill all the obligations as demanded by the BRSR mandate. That acceptance is the first step in the right direction. This alone will require the team to look for and identify any gaps or weaknesses and then devise plans of action to close those gaps.

Our take:

Let BRSR be your friend in your sustainability journey. Let it not be the four-letter word for you to fear, and comply with the fear.

Use the pathways created by SEBI as your guideline. Instead of making it an ego hustle, pinpoint the loopholes in the questionnaires/format to the regulator when it releases consultation papers.

In all honesty, corporates are investing money, time, resources, and effort to become sustainable. The reasons can be many: regulatory, corporate policy, government action, geographic expansion, or a sincere effort to be a sustainable business.

Overall, the NSE circular and the CEI survey have come as eye-openers for all the stakeholders. This is not just a compelling pull-and-push theory or story, but a collective effort for a sustainable business, a greener planet, and able governance!

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Tightening loose-ends in BRSR

WriteCanvas News


Even as SEBI has mandated the top 1000 listed companies to report their green performances through BRSR, many corporates have been found lacking.

A new survey by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) reviewed 28 reports submitted by 14 top companies.

The survey comes on the heels of a recent NSE circular that highlighted the shortcomings in BRSR reporting by the top 1,000 listed companies.

According to CSE, The current BRSR questionnaire format leads to incomplete submissions, hindering the creation of a reporting structure for informed investor decision-making.

What is wrong with the current reporting guidelines?

The current BRSR format presents challenges in understanding the rationale behind parameter values and number changes.

For example, lack of consolidated company data vs unit-specific data.

Companies tweaking the questionnaire: Companies often provide data selectively and adjust information rows for convenience, but deciding how to present the data should not be their responsibility. Companies can share key indicators like water withdrawal, consumption, and discharge voluntarily under ‘Leadership Indicators’, but these can be moved to the ‘Essential Indicators’ category for mandatory data.

CSE Recommendations:

The CSE assessment suggests that a company’s sustainability can be more effectively assessed by identifying low-performing units and creating plans to improve their performance across multiple metrics.

These include:

Opt for a sector-specific approach: The current SEBI-developed disclosure format lacks sector-specific guidelines, affecting investors’ understanding of environmentally conscious businesses. A sector-specific approach, similar to international frameworks, could provide a comprehensive understanding of investment opportunities in specific industries.

Update the BRSR guidance document: In July 2023, the BRSR questionnaire and format underwent review, but the guidance document was not updated simultaneously, resulting in insufficient information on the air emissions submission format.

Include table formats to enable data capture: Businesses should be limited in their data display options, allowing for specific table formats. SEBI may provide a protected spreadsheet for the BRSR questionnaire, but not format editing.

Non-hazardous and hazardous wastes should be accounted for separately: SEBI requests data on waste generation, but only asks about management and disposal methods, not recycling, reuse, or disposal of waste. SEBI should investigate waste production and disposal in top three waste streams, including hazardous and non-hazardous materials, plastic, e-waste, biomedical waste, and non-manufacturable waste types.

Mandate specific energy and water consumption data: The company is tasked with reporting on the optional energy and water intensity parameter included in the BRSR format. The CSE recommends companies provide data on their energy consumption (SEC) and water consumption (SWC) in kilowatt or megawatt/tonne of the product. The data provided will undoubtedly indicate a company’s overall energy and water efficiency in its manufacturing process.

Lead quotes:

“The BRSR framework is the first attempt by any regulatory authority or agency in India to mandate the sharing of such detailed environmental performance and compliance data in the public domain,” notes Nivit Yadav, Program Director, Industrial Pollution, CSE. “In today’s era of climate change, where resource availability is becoming a serious issue, sharing of such data in a transparent manner should be one of the key drivers in decision-making by investors.”

“Yet, we believe there is much room for improvement in the BRSR framework. Our goal is to contribute to its strengthening in order to guarantee higher-calibre reporting from the companies. Periodically, SEBI reviews the guidance note and BRSR format. We hope that when SEBI reviews it again, it will take into account the suggestions made by CSE, which can aid in gathering more insightful data.

The BRSR framework is the first attempt by any regulatory authority or agency in India to mandate the sharing of detailed environmental performance and compliance data in the public domain.

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

SEBI Outlines Value Chain Disclosure Provisions in BRSR Core

WriteCanvas News


A new SEBI circular outlines provisions for ESG disclosures for the value chain, including disclosures for upstream and downstream partners and reporting KPIs in the BRSR Core for their value chain.

The proposal outlines several changes to the value chain reporting system, including rationalizing the definition of ‘value chain’ to cover only significant partners.

Some of these changes include:

• The proposed changes to the definition of value chain partners include excluding upstream and downstream partners, each comprising 2% or more of a listed entity’s purchases and sales.

• This will reduce the maximum number of upstream/downstream partners from 50 to 38, ensuring coverage of key partners.

• For the first year of reporting ESG disclosures, previous year numbers will be voluntary.

• The listed entity will also disclose the percentage of total sales and purchases covered by these partners.

• The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has recommended adding a leadership indicator to BRSR, stating the number of Green Credits generated by the company and its value chain partners.

The committee also recommends redefining value chain partners to include upstream and downstream partners, each comprising 2% or more of the entity’s purchases and sales, to avoid cost burden and compliance issues for small businesses.

The new provision is a part of the Security and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)’s expert Committee that has proposed measures to improve the ease of doing business concerning BRSR.

The proposed amendments will be carried out in Regulation 34 (2)(f) of LODR Regulations, SEBI said in the circular.

The proposed amendment to the LODR Regulations and SEBI circulars on BRSR aims to replace the term “assurance” with “assessment” in the annual report, requiring listed entities to obtain an assurance assessment of the BRSE Core for their value chain.

The Regulations, 2015 mandates annual reports of the top 1,000 listed entities based on market capitalization to include a BRSR report on ESG disclosures.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Most common mistakes listed companies make while filing BRSR

WriteCanvas News


Having reviewed the BRSR submissions made by the top 1000 listed companies for FY2022-23, the National Stock Exchange identified several areas of variation and lack of uniformity in the disclosures made.

The NSE has addressed these issues in a new circular. It has been said that listed companies must carefully consider these points when submitting the BRSR XBRL utility and avoid deviations.

After reviewing the BRSR submissions for the fiscal year 2022–2023, the Exchange found several discrepancies and inconsistencies in the disclosures provided by the listed companies.

Companies are required by the BRSR format to respond to questions about policy formulation across nine principles with a Yes/No option. Nevertheless, some businesses have not included their sustainability report in the required format or with a mapping of the questions and answers, according to the NSE circular.

Other observations:

• Certain companies only offer links to their websites; they do not offer links to specific documents.

• Certain companies have disclosed the overall turnover rate for both permanent and contract workers, but they have not disclosed the specifics necessary to distinguish between contract workers, employees, and permanent and non-permanent workers.

• Businesses selling goods and services are required to offer a minimum of 100% product and NIC code bifurcation.

• Certain companies have revealed absolute figures rather than percentages, indicating a lack of consistency in their methods for sourcing sustainable inputs and materials.

• Businesses are required to disclose the procedures they use to securely retrieve products for recycling, reuse, and disposal at the end of their useful lives.

Some more inconsistencies:

Additionally, there is inconsistency in the disclosures provided under the headings of employees and workers (including differently abled) and measures of employees’ and workers’ well-being. Businesses have disclosed the actual compensation paid to all employees, but not the median compensation paid to each employee, NSE noted in the circular.

Preparing to report BRSR for FY2023-24?

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a circular requiring the top one thousand listed companies to submit a Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) for the Financial Year 2023-24.

The circular provides FAQs, guidelines, and general observations for the last year’s BRSR filing.

Top 150 listed companies based on market capitalization as of March 31, 2024, are mandatory to obtain a Reasonable Assurance of BRSR Core as specified by the SEBI Circular.

Companies must provide details of their assurance provider and the type of assurance obtained in the BRSR utility. The BRSR XBRL utility at the BSE portal can be used for uploading at the NSE NEAPS portal and vice versa.

Instead of publishing the whole report, the BRSR Link can be attached with the Annual Report.

The timeline for submitting the BRSR is the same day of submission of the Annual Report with the Exchanges.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Sustainability Disclosure netting corporate sector

Sonal Desai


Sustainability disclosure is netting the global corporate sector,

The corporate segment is just a month away from disclosing its quarterly financial results. Besides the financial analysts who are waiting with a hawk eye to review the company’s performance and forecast its trajectory, another set–of sustainability experts are keen to study the impact of various regulatory disclosures that companies have undertaken and the impact of these regulations.

However, for the business as usual (BaU), commissions and governments are giving out mixed signals. On a positive note, Singapore will introduce mandatory climate-related reporting requirements for listed and large non-listed companies starting in 2025. The rules were announced by the Second Minister for Finance Chee Hong Tat, and details were released by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) and Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo). The new reporting obligations will be phased, starting with listed companies in 2025 and large non-listed companies in 2027.

The specific obligations for each group will be phased in over time, with listed companies reporting on Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the first year and large non-listed companies starting in 2029. The government will also focus on helping companies develop sustainability reporting and assurance competencies.

The country already has stringent ESG compliance standards. The new mandate will strengthen its stand in the global Destination Sustainability Index, demonstrating its commitment to real change.

Back home in India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced BRSR in 2021, last year upgraded the compliance to introduce Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) Core that includes nine new principles to include the value chain and the customers, as well as third-party assurance.

The framework is set to undergo a significant transformation in 2024, requiring top 1000 companies to ensure reasonable assurance, enhancing transparency, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Analysts have pointed out SEBI’s reduction in the number of listed corporates required to submit BRSR reports from 1000, resulting in a decrease in compliance.

On the other hand, in Europe, the Council and the European Parliament have reached a provisional agreement to delay sustainability reporting for certain sectors and third-country companies by two years. The agreement will allow more time for companies to prepare for the sectorial European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) and specific standards for large non-EU companies, which will be adopted in June 2026. The agreement aims to boost European competitiveness by reducing the administrative burden on companies and allowing them time to implement the ESRS and prepare for the sectorial European Sustainability Reporting Standards.

The Commission proposed reducing reporting obligations by 25% without undermining related policy objectives, and the provisional agreement now needs to be endorsed and formally adopted by both institutions. The date of application for third-country companies will remain the financial year 2028, as set out in the CSRD.

Sustainability and ESG reporting are now mainstream. Regionally, corporates are abiding by the local rules and therefore, have an ESG strategy in place. For those organizations that have a multi-national presence, compliance gets tougher as they have to comply with multiple regulations.

What is required is a linear compliance mechanism that will enable the multinationals, or domestic companies targeting global expansion to seamlessly adhere to the compliance.

The organizations have come a long way in terms of change of attitude from tick-boxing compliance mandates to impact-driven outcomes. However, not meeting climate action targets remains a concern. For this, we need stricter and faster implementation of regulations.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

Why Should Companies Prepare a Sustainability Report?

Renjini Liza Varghese


Globally, the pace of climate action is accelerating. More countries are enacting and embracing green mandates and tightening regulations. This pushes companies to reassess their operations and ensure their products meet evolving sustainability standards.

In this context, the value of a sustainability report gains traction. These reports serve as vital tools for companies to navigate the green landscape.

The conversations about the suitability report with industry stakeholders reveal new facts, that are sometimes eye-openers.

For instance, in the past few months, I have come across many interesting facts regarding the sustainability initiatives of large and mid-size organizations. Basis the companies’ sustainability initiatives and my observations, I am bracketing those into three key categories.

The three key categories:

Laid-back approach: These companies implemented sustainable practices early on but haven’t documented the impact, or claimed carbon credits, leaving potential value untapped.

The greenwashing dodger: Companies seeking easy shortcuts and using “greenwashing practices” as tightened regulations are sometimes a challenge.

Uninformed exporters: Many Indian MSMEs and SMBs, particularly exporters, are unaware of the changing global regulatory landscape, putting them at risk of being left behind.

Several survey reports have highlighted the above-mentioned reasons why Indian companies have missed out on crucial deals. Except for the top 1000 listed companies (by market capitalization), creating a sustainability or ESG report is not mandatory in the country. All the same, with increasing awareness, the time is right for companies to develop a sustainability report.

Let me list the 5 compelling benefits of creating a sustainability report.

1. Identify gaps and opportunities: A report acts as a mirror, reflecting your environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and helps set goals for future progress.

2. Future-proofing: Even if your company isn’t currently subject to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting regulations, an annual sustainability report makes future ESG reporting easier.

3. Carbon credits: By quantifying your environmental impact, you unlock the potential to claim valuable carbon credits, leading to financial benefits and compliance with some environmental regulations.

4. Transparency and trust: Openly communicating your sustainability effort fosters trust and strengthens relationships with stakeholders, including investors, customers, and employees.

5. Brand image and reputation: In today’s conscious consumer market, a strong sustainability report can significantly boost your brand image and attract environmentally conscious customers.

So, creating a sustainability report is no longer optional. It’s a strategic investment that unlocks numerous benefits, regardless of your company’s size or current regulatory obligations. This can secure a competitive edge for the companies and also unlock a multitude of benefits.

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Social investments, BRSR, ESG

Latest News Thumbnail

Social Finds Emphasis at BRSR workshop

WriteCanvas News


Social, a key component of Environment, Social and Governance or ESG, is finally getting its due.

In a recent SoBE workshop for BRSR professionals, speakers highlighted the significance of social responsibility and the impact of investments on businesses.

ESG and BRSR were the focal points of a one-day workshop conducted by The School of Business Environment (SoBE), a specialized division of the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA), and some partners.

The ESG emphasis:

Dr. Ravi Raj Atrey, Chief Program Officer, SoBE, IICA, discussed ESG’s role in establishing a Responsible Brand, highlighting the connection between sustainability and responsible branding.

Dinesh Agrawal, Principal Consultant, Consocia Advisory, conducted a session on “Exploring the ‘S’ of ESG.” The session focused on the analysis of the social responsibility and impact of investments and businesses. Mr Agrawal emphasized that the letter “S” stands for several things, such as equitable labor practices, inclusivity and diversity, and worker welfare. The incorporation of social considerations into ESG frameworks is a reflection of the growing understanding that social responsibility and sustainable business practices are inextricably linked to long-term success and favorable societal outcomes.

The workshop:

Overall, the one-day workshop on Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) featured over eight technical sessions. These sessions emphasized the key components of BRSR Disclosures and resolution.

In his inaugural address, Praveen Kumar, DG & CEO, IICA, said that the training will fulfill the demand for ESG professionals. The role of ESG and BRSR is not merely on compliance or cost to the company. It is a strategic Investment.

Key highlights from other sessions:

The first technical session was on the Interlinking of ESG-NGRBC-BRSR Principles. Prof. Garima Dadhich, Associate Professor & Head SoBE, IICA, explained the various Principles of NGRBC and their relevance with BRSR.

The next session on BRSR- Industrial Perspective was taken by Bharat Wakhlu, Founder-President, The Wakhlu Advisory. He highlighted the importance of happy and healthy living for current and future generations, emphasizing the industrial sector’s duty and role.

In the session on Illustrating Top Companies BRSR Database, Dheeraj, Lead-Programmes, PRAXIS, discussed the growth and acceptance of BRSR by companies, emphasizing its role as a ‘Roadmap’ rather than a strict compliance format.

Pradeep Narayanan, CEO, Partner in Change, discussed the importance of human rights and DE & I in addressing social equity and inclusion. He pointed out the impact of issues on businesses and provided explanations for the materiality approach’ and saliency approach.

The Session on Women and Children Friendly Policies (NGRBC Principles 3, 5, and 8) was conducted by Shubrajyoti Bhowmik, Public and Private Partnership Officer, UNICEF. He emphasized the need to uphold women’s and children’s rights and establish safety precautions. Businesses must show their dedication to moral and socially conscious behavior, making a positive contribution to society and supporting global sustainability goals. This should not be done to satisfy policy requirements.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blog

Latest News Thumbnail

DEI: What is prevalent, Greenwashing? 

Renjini Liza Varghese


It is sad to see that greenwashing in each segment of ESG is prevalent.

The other day, when my colleague wrote about whether ESG is losing its steam, we had a lengthy conversation on how the segment is panning out globally and in India. We deduced that a section of society is driving the message that ESG is outdated.

However, we also agreed that compliance, statute, and an intent will drive ESG implementation in a developing country like India. Moreover, we have also noticed that the ‘S’ factor of ESG is the least cared for. The S factor has many facets, from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) on one side to human rights and community development on the other.

DEI is the new buzzword in the corporate world. We have come across some eye-opening facts during our conversations with various stakeholders in the last year. For example, a CXO associated with a large company in the aviation segment admitted that though the organization releases a Sustainability/ESG report for the past few years, it is yet to appoint a woman at the board level. This particular company is not an exception. Many large organizations that are also under BRSR purview have appointed women at the board level. However, experts argue that it is a token meant to tick box the compliance. The point I am making here is that diversity is a vital criteria of ESG.

Let us move to the noises (it is just noise and not voice yet) around us on DEI. Each industry segment, whether tech, manufacturing, BFSI or services, has DEI experts on board. But they all refuse to answer critical, uncomfortable questions. We have noticed that everyone wants to be there at the top order. Keywords such as DEI, inclusion, women, leadership vision, etc, meet their SEO criteria. Beyond the conversations in the boardroom, they have done zilch to act upon the valuable treasure trove of data (both in-house and through external agencies), on the impact. Ironically, they dodge any DEI questions within their organization but sit on the judge’s chair and discuss DEI best practices at industry events. They know how to make a lot of noise and get noticed in the process. Initially, I took the conversations with these people at face value. Thankfully, I learnt my truth faster and now rely on my gut instinct and research to counter them.

By voicing my experience, I am not trying to paint a gloomy picture. Infact, there are corporates that have implemented DEI, and it continues to be among their top priority. From freshers’ recruitment levels to the board, they have skilfully integrated diversity.

Our aim at WriteCanvas is to create the narrative—sift the noise from the actual use cases (however small the integration maybe), and enable a system supported by the policy. And that allows DEI or inclusion in the true sense and not just tickboxing.  Join us if you believe in creating the structure.

As part of this endeavor, WriteCanvas in association with the DEI Committee of ASSOCHAM Southern Region, is conducting a survey on the S factor of the ESG implemented by companies. Here is the link to the questionnaire. LINK:

We will publish the findings and will share key take-aways with you.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

News

Latest News Thumbnail

Indian automotive sector: in pursuit of sustainability

WriteCanvas News


The automotive and auto ancillaries industry in India contributes $70 billion or 2.1% to the national GDP, and employs 5 million people.

While the sector accounts for 4.5% of India’s merchandise exports, it is also responsible for 1.4% of the country’s annual greenhouse gas emissions. Implementing sustainability priorities could help India achieve net-zero emissions.

These are the findings of a new The Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA)-McKinsey study titled: Mobility 360° – Sustainability for competitiveness: A perspective on sustainability in the automotive sector.

OEMs worldwide set upstream decarbonization targets, requiring suppliers’ interventions, especially for Scope 3. India’s automotive companies commit to decarbonization, with use-phase emissions potentially dropping as electric vehicle adoption rates rise.

Key findings:

  •  Sustainability is a priority for most Indian OEMs
  • Controlling Scope-1 and -2 emissions primary focus
  • Encouraging suppliers on sustainability themes to reduce Scope-3 upstream emissions
  •  Many OEMs are adopting targets, measuring and tracking key performance indicators and disclosing ESG information
  •  While 100 per cent disclosure on ESG reports is still some way off, the journey has begun

Some stats:

  1. 3/4  OEMs list sustainability among their top 5 business KPIs
  2. 2/4 OEMs are working with suppliers to change designs for circularity
  3. 3/4 OEMs disclose ESG information in their annual report/BRSR report
  4. OEMs are already rolling out RFQs incorporating decarbonization targets

Indian OEMs are currently where EU players were a few years ago OEMs’ demand for sustainable operations may suddenly change as policies change. Indian suppliers could kick off efforts to be better prepared for these changes, to become preferred suppliers for OEMs in the future, the authors noted in the report.

Offense vs defense:

Playing defense in the global sustainability push can lead to a growing capital cost, declining market share, and reactive mode. On the other hand, companies can play offence, resulting in a 20-30% valuation increase and increased strategic distance from competitors. This strategy relies on five drivers:

  • Chasing new business opportunities: Companies could build new green businesses by tapping into existing assets, capabilities and relationships.
  •  Targeting sustainability qualification-led–led growth: Offering green products that match customer expectations (e.g., green packaging) and requirements (e.g., carbon neutral steel) could lead companies to command a higher premium in the market.
  • Achieving sustainability-led cost reduction: Thoughtful use of resources such as energy, water, waste and raw materials could help improve resource efficiencies.
  • Improving employee productivity, well-being and morale: Companies could implement a holistic strategy for employee engagement to cut down attrition, boost sales productivity, and control absenteeism as employees feel rejuvenated and inspired by their organization.
  • Growing valuation impact (equity): A compelling sustainability story and credible strategy could drive up valuation and expand multiples.

Material circularity, renewable energy, decarbonization:

Material circularity in the automotive sector can increase the industry’s top line by 10-20%, reduce costs by 5-10%, and decrease CO2 emissions by 50-70%. India’s automotive sector is promoting circularity due to policy and regulatory support, high primary material prices, and increased carbon markets. Recycled materials require less energy and reduce geopolitical risk.

The report noted that auto-component manufacturers in India primarily rely on electricity for manufacturing and assembly processes, accounting for 90% of their energy needs. However, a shift to renewable energy sources is crucial as grid electricity is the primary emission source. Between 2019 and 2022, thermal sources accounted for 74% of the total electricity generation mix. Solar and wind energy accounted for 11% of the mix in 2022. Alternatives for energy decarbonization include behind-the-meter solar, captive renewable energy access, and energy efficiency improvements. Companies can also consider gas-based, bio-mass-based, solar, hydrogen, or electric boilers.

Respondents from the auto suppliers segment indicated new business opportunities, sustainability qualification-led growth and sustainability-led cost reduction as the three most relevant themes.

The journey of automotive companies and their suppliers to reduce emissions calls for a focus on two big themes.

  1. A concerted effort towards energy decarbonization by mapping the greatest sources of emissions (electricity, steam, backup power, etc.) and finding scalable, cost-efficient alternatives to these.
  2. A quest to attain material circularity – with sound decisions about material sourcing, product design, process selection, and associated logistics management to ensure an overall sustainable value chain for automotive companies.

The role of the stakeholders:

Sustainability is becoming mandatory for operating licenses, but implementing it requires industry alignment, cross-value chain partnerships, and collaboration with stakeholders. The government can support this by strengthening reporting regulations, introducing incentives, tax benefits, and grants, and promoting circular-economy principles. Automotive industry bodies can create a scalable sustainability framework, drive capability-building programs, and facilitate collaborations. OEMs can support domestic suppliers by setting ambitious decarbonization targets, adopting renewable energy options, and designing products for circularity. Suppliers can be at the forefront of this transformation by moving sustainability closer to their business priorities, investing in energy transition initiatives, and working with OEMs to drive circularity.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

background

Blogs

Latest News Thumbnail

How different is CSR from ESG or BRSR?

Renjini Liza Varghese


In recent years, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations have gained traction among corporate boardrooms in India. ESG is increasingly becoming a critical aspect of board discussions as companies realize that compliance with ESG frameworks can significantly impact their long-term growth and sustainability.

Don’t CSR activities cover for ESG? How different is BRSR reporting from BRR? Is it really going to affect my organization as the size is comparatively smaller? 

These are some of the frequent questions that come my way during my preliminary interactions with organizations that consult me for ESG. Through a series of articles, I will try and clarify the doubts. What I have realized is, awareness in terms of narratives will play a crucial part in shaping the NET ZERO journey. 

Today, I want to touch upon the CSR vs ESG topic. 

CSR or ESG? 

Firstly, it is important to understand the difference between CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and ESG. CSR is the voluntary commitment by companies to contribute to society, while ESG factors a broader range of issues such as climate change, human rights, supply chain management, and diversity and inclusion. While CSR initiatives are crucial for companies, they do not necessarily cover all aspects of ESG. On the other hand, ESG is essential in assessing a company’s overall sustainability.

It is essential to note that ESG discussions in the boardroom are not about philanthropy or charity. Instead, ESG considerations are strategic decisions that can impact a company’s long-term success. In recent years, CXOs (Chief Executive Officers, Chief Financial Officers, and Chief Operating Officers) have come to recognize the potential risks associated with ESG and are taking a proactive role in managing them. They understand that ESG issues can impact their company’s reputation, financial performance, and shareholder value. As a result, the visibility of ESG discussions at the CXO level has significantly increased.

In particular, the Sustainability Officer or Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) role is gaining prominence in the boardroom. The CSO is responsible for overseeing the company’s ESG initiatives and ensuring they align with its overall business strategy. The CSO provides a vital link between the board and the company’s ESG objectives and ensures that ESG considerations are integrated into the company’s decision-making processes.

 Another meaningful change in the boardroom is the increased transparency and accountability regarding ESG issues. Companies are now disclosing more information about their ESG initiatives in their annual reports, sustainability reports, and other public disclosures. This increased transparency allows stakeholders to evaluate a company’s ESG performance and hold it accountable for its actions.

I will come back soon with my POV on BRR Vs BRSR. Soon! 

 

 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function twenty_twenty_one_the_posts_navigation() in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php:31 Stack trace: #0 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include() #1 /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home2/writecxc...') #2 /home2/writecxc/public_html/index.php(17): require('/home2/writecxc...') #3 {main} thrown in /home2/writecxc/public_html/wp-content/themes/twentytwentyone-child/archive.php on line 31